Dismantling IAMC’s Fabricated Smear Campaign Against VHPA (Part 5 of 8) – Selective Outrage Over Speakers

A handful of controversial speakers are used to define VHPA’s organizational character, while Muslim advocacy organizations routinely host or honor figures tied to extremist or terrorism-related controversies without attracting comparable scrutiny or public outrage.

The next allegation in Rasheed Ahmed’s article pertains to a small number of controversial speakers as purported evidence of VHPA’s alleged extremism. This is a direct quote from Ahmed’s article: “The VHPA does not deny that it invited Yati Narsinghanand, a cleric who has publicly called for the extermination of Muslims, to the U.S. It does not deny that it platformed Kajal Hindustani, an Islamophobic speaker…” 

The allegation rests on a sweeping and inconsistent assumption that merely inviting or hosting a speaker automatically defines an organization’s entire ideology and character. One cited example, involving Yati Narsinghanand, ignores an important fact. He was invited to a local chapter program before his most controversial remarks became public, and the invitation was withdrawn once those statements emerged. [1]

Major U.S.-based Muslim advocacy and community organizations, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), and the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), have documented records of inviting, honoring, or sharing platforms with individuals tied to designated terrorist organizations or convicted in terrorism-related cases. The following examples are gleaned from court records, U.S. Treasury designations, and contemporaneous investigative reporting.

While the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) continues to fixate on a handful of controversial speakers who have appeared on VHPA platforms, it has not uttered a single word of concern or indignation over U.S.-designated extremists, terrorism-linked figures, or convicted individuals who have appeared at events hosted within its wider advocacy orbit. Not a single statement of outrage. Not a single public denunciation. Moral outrage, it seems, is reserved for cases that do not fit IAMC’s preferred narrative.

Read Part 4: Asymmetrical Accountability Standards

Read Part 6: Using Academic Cover for Advocacy 

Citations

[1] Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America (VHPA) Official Statement on the cancellation (April 2021): https://twitter.com/VHPANews/status/1382207509595877376

[2] Investigative Project on Terrorism, “Days Before UAE Terror Designation, CAIR Awards PIJ Board Member,” November 20, 2014, https://www.investigativeproject.org/4660/days-before-uae-terror-designation-cair-awards

[3] Middle East Forum, “CAIR ‘Exposes’ Itself,” August 26, 2020, https://www.meforum.org/cair-exposes-itself-61434.

[4] Algemeiner, “CAIR-Ohio Director Moderates Event With US-Designated Hamas Terrorist,” October 28, 2025, https://www.algemeiner.com/2025/10/28/cair-ohio-director-moderates-event-us-designated-hamas-terrorist/

[5] Algemeiner, “CAIR-Ohio Director Moderates Event With US-Designated Hamas Terrorist,” October 28, 2025, https://www.algemeiner.com/2025/10/28/cair-ohio-director-moderates-event-us-designated-hamas-terrorist/

[6] Investigative Project on Terrorism, Masjid At-Taqwa profile (citing U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White’s 1995 letter listing unindicted co-conspirators); federal court records from the 1993 World Trade Center bombing prosecution, https://www.investigativeproject.org/mosques/409/masjid-at-taqwa

[7] Investigative Project on Terrorism, “ICNA’s Search for Radicalism Should Start Within,” December 15, 2009, https://www.investigativeproject.org/1577/icnas-search-for-radicalism-should-start-within

Dr. Jai G. Bansal
Dr. Jai G. Bansal
Dr. Jai Bansal is a retired scientist, currently serving as the VP Education for the Vishwa Hindu Parishad America (VHPA)
See All Contributions

Donate to HINDUDVESHA

Our Mission is to explore and expose Hindudvesha through research analysis, education and response.

SUPPORT US